From April 29, 2017, Genevieve Padalecki tweeted this picture of herself and the newest Padalecki, Odette:
— Genevieve Padalecki (@realGpad) April 29, 2017
Two weeks later, Genevieve tweets this picture:
So lucky to be a grand daughter, daughter, and mother. Happy #MothersDay to all of the amazing moms! 💐🥂🌸✨ pic.twitter.com/02TH8JyrO9— Genevieve Padalecki (@realGpad) May 14, 2017
If the photo captures were real time, I'm just wondering why the baby would have so much more hair on April 29, than May 14. It seems a little early yet for that "first haircut".
pic sources: Twitter
our playlist: Hair - The Cowsills
Suicide Blonde - INXS
4 comments:
And what is my point with this post besides the fact that if Genevieve wants the pictures to reflect real time the hair growth is distinctly different on the baby's head?
While the "3-generation" picture does show more of baby Odette's face than previous ones, there has been an obvious reluctance to show details, much like Jensen used to be with JJ. Except the difference between Jensen and Genevieve is a divide the width of the Atlantic Ocean.
The reluctance contrasts with Genevieve's repetitive and OTT posting of leather hearts and baby tips and I don't know what all. It's suspicious. Of course, I'm told that this is because of the upcoming "magazine cover" which is on the agenda, whenever that's going to happen.
And it very well could be. But Mgmnt better get cranking on that prospect before Odette is out of diapers and into pull-ups, lol.
I'm thinking Genevieve has not been posing with the real Odette Padalecki. The baby Jared was with in that pink picture? THAT was Odette.
Just my thoughts on it.
If you're going to do a big splashy magazine piece on your new baby and this is why you won't show her face, then why do you keep putting up back-of-the-head shots on your Instagram?
Why not withhold all pictures? That makes the magazine story all that more exclusive.
I must be missing something here.
There is so much hinkiness going on in this fandom, it's not funny. It will be a quite interesting summer hiatus. You've got a few former "J2 believers" turning 180's and now touting that the J's have broken up. I find this extremely interesting.
I just think J2 believers need to be on their guard. The fact that there have been several 180's is cause for big time side eyeing.
I don't mean "on guard" as in there's cause to believe the break up rumors, on the contrary. I mean "on guard" as far as what the J's people might be seeding for the future. Hopefully not.
But one of the names that came up on Spn_Goss as far as being a former believer and now turning a 180, is an account that I had quite regular contact with for quite awhile. Does it surprise me? Not at all, because the main reason I broke off all communication with that person was because I am certain she was a mgmnt sponsored account. I became acquainted with this person through LJ, not Twitter.
Someday soon I'm going to do a post on how Mgmnt sends accounts to some of us with the full intent of finding out information. I firmly believe this happens, no doubt at all.
Since I came to the J2 fandom, there have always been a few mild uprisings of "J2 Trouble in Paradise!", you know, just questioning and worrying. But this time around, there seems to be a bit of persistence and it's because of the nature of this latest round that's causing me to keep an extra eye out for any further oddity, lol. We'll see.
Well, well, well....Genevieve Padalecki has tweeted this today:
why I don't even know what to say
It's a terrible photoshop job, the proportions are way off.
When you have to photo shop on such short notice, the results aren't good and well, you shouldn't have to photo shop at all, right? You shouldn't. End of story.
Post a Comment