Tuesday, August 30, 2016

To Cradle or Not to Cradle?

If you follow Austin Nichols at all on Twitter or Instagram, it would be quite difficult to miss his "fondness" for the beard's two canine pets, Arthur and Wally.   Photo mementos of him with the two dogs adorn not only his social media, but their owner's, Bennet.  Interestingly, we rarely saw him with Sophia Bush's dogs, if at all. I think there was one photo op at an airport where her dogs were seen.

Could be a preference of pose, wouldn't you say?












Is it a simple case of exhibiting dominance?  Or could it be a counterbalancing act?  Sayyyyy....versus these poses???







Maybe the question should instead be, to wrap or goalpost?


picture creds:  People, IHJ, pinterest, tumblr
song:   I'll Be Good to You - Quincy Jones, Ray Charles and Chaka Khan
Take Me In Your Arms - The Doobie Brothers
Safe in the Arms of Love - Martina McBride
 




15 comments:

prairiegirl said...

Goodness, right? Of course, that last picture of "the Wally Stuff" is a photo shop I have no doubt whatsoever. But the image was sent out to the masses, nonetheless.

prairiegirl said...

I can see I may be waiting for a current picture of Danneel Harris Ackles in her present "state" just like I'm STILL waiting for that picture of Reese in the courtyard with Jake at Maggie and Peter's wedding in Italy way back in....why that was 2009.

Still waiting for that pic of Reesey-poo in Italy. IN the courtyard with Jake and the fam.

We've had potato pics of who was supposed to be Danneel from the Hindenburg, I mean from blocks and blocks away. And now we've had a couple of tweet "sightings" and "meetings" with Jensen and the fam. And we've got a picture of one of the fans with Jensen, but oddly enough, we have no pics of Danneel. Isn't that not a surprise. At all.

Here's the kicker, though. There's not one other soul on Spn_Gos who seems to be doubting this whole scenario of Danneel carrying these twins. All the anons are speaking in the absolute truth that she is pregnant. Surrogacy not even creeping into any thread.

Un stinkin believable.

prairiegirl said...

These comments coming from the same "anon" blew my mind. They came later today:

Re: Re: Jensen Sighting, Aug. 29?
2016-08-30 12:10pm (local)

Ayrt

Not the girl that took the photo but I passed them. They were at a kids playpark in Yaletown and that girl also seems to have spotted them in the same place. I clocked a tall guy in a button down shirt and a baseball cap and I just knew without him turning around that it was Jensen (his legs). I then quickly looked around for Jared but didn't see him, there were lots of kids and other adults around them and I'm not sure if they were part of a kids party as there was a table covered in a pink tablecloth off to the side. I did see Danneel, she was facing away from me and knelt down interacting with another child (not JJ). There were lots of kids surrounding them - too many for me to start trying to look for Shep and Thomas and there were a few adults as well but I did see JJ in the group of kids surrounding them. Jensen was standing beside the kneeling Danneel and turned in my direction and looked right at me. He wasn't wearing his sunglasses so I saw his face and he looked amazing - much better than this picture is giving him credit for.

I didn't stop for a picture for a couple of reasons: 1) he was with his family and what also seemed to be other people as well, 2) I was just coming to the end of a 2 hour cycle and looked like something my cat would spit up, 3) Jensen Ackles looked right at me and my ability to function just disappeared (and I say that as a Jensen loving Jared girl).


when asked this by a different anon:

Re: Re: Jensen Sighting, Aug. 29?
Anonymous)
2016-08-30 04:24 am (local)

Are you the girl who posted the picture? Which street is he on? Can you share anything else about what Danneel looked like, hairstyle, what she was wearing or was doing?
That would make it also ten minutes from his own apartment, in the middle of the main Vancouver shopping district. So it looks like he was in the middle of the shopping area, right by Jim Michaels and the other actors and director's apartments. Maybe visiting Jim or Kim.


their reply was:

Re: Re: Jensen Sighting, Aug. 29?
(Anonymous)
2016-08-30 12:56 pm (local)
Track This
ayrt

Not the girl that posted the picture but did spot them. Sorry, but you expect me to be looking at Danneel when Jensen Ackles is in my eyeline. Are you being serious?

As soon as I spotted Jensen, I had a quick look for Jared. Jensen was standing directly beside a woman who was kneeling down facing away from me. I guessed this woman to be Danneel and all I saw of her was straight dyed red hair and part of her face side on. As much as I can be sure, given I'm not a follower of the wives, I would say that was Danneel. I wasn't interested in what she was wearing and I didn't see her baby bump as I saw her from the back and her face slightly to the side. Like I said, eyes only for Jensen (and Jared who I didn't see).

In terms of where I spotted them, it was at David Lam Park which is neither 10 minutes from his apartment, nor the middle of the main shopping area. They were at the playpark and JJ was with other kids who were surrounding Jensen and Danneel and there were a few other adults - not sure if they were with Jensen but he wasn't speaking to any of them.


Jensen and the fam allegedly in Vancouver


I'm sorry, I can't believe that whole thread was full of comments by anons just eating up the whole sighting. Is it one of those cases where there are just so many details given, that it couldn't possibly be untrue? The anon can remember everything BUT what Danneel was wearing. Amazing.

And couldn't tell if there was a baby bump. Yet if anyone recalls, the Hindenburg potato pic showed someone who was about twice the width of Danneel from behind. smh.

Just ignore me on this one. I had to vent somewhere. lol.

Methodical Muser said...


I've been thinking about that trademark Austin pose with those dogs and I definitely suspect it is a premeditated pose. First off, as PG illustrates, there is a pattern of similar posturing that has been captured on innumerable occasions for nearly two years and purposely uploaded to both his and his fake girlfriend's social media accounts. Secondly, Austin is never interacting with either dog in any kind of genuine affectionate way. He is consistently emotionally detached and not just dominating, but reflecting a very gruff, uncaring, and certainly reckless attitude. The image that is created is unmistakable. Austin doesn’t have one nurturing bone in his body. He has no experience relating to something that is smaller and more fragile. Conclusion: Only a fool would think Austin is familiar with being around babies and/or children.

PR knows the conclusions that many fans came to regarding Jake and Boo. His tenderness and natural nurturing instincts were obvious. He literally cradles Boo as if the pup were a helpless infant. And, his unswerving gentleness was on display for the whole world to see. The timing was also eye opening because Jake acquired Boo in the latter part of 2005, right around the time the boyfriend rumors with Austin began and he was seen in public with him on numerous occasions from November 2005 into the summer of 2007. Interestingly enough, the rumors began about Baby Tile in January, 2007. And the rest, as they say, is history.

Methodical Muser said...


Reshaping Jake’s image


Speaking of Jakey, I would not be surprised that the rough way he treated that ferret on the Amy Schumer show last May, was all about "rehabilitating" that sweet and nurturing image he had with animals. In fact, there were many comments from posters that expressed disapproval of his uncaring and violent shaking of the furry creature. Jake's team is sooooo desperate to portray him in as dark a manner as possible.

destiny said...

I'm reading a mystery, and last night one of the characters started talking about that restaurant Jar in L.A. It got me to thinking about that sighting we had of Jake and Austin there.

Remember when we used to also get lots of sightings of Jake in all kinds of foodie places and restaurants We don't seem to get that anymore. Heck, it seems like we don't get much of anything that lets you in on anything personal about Jake--or should I say anything things that are meant to build a certain image of Jake.

Only with Austin do we get that. I agree that the photos of Austin with the dog are meant to show him in a more macho light. Probably not fitting of his image to get all gooey over cute little dogs.

prairiegirl said...

Remember when we used to also get lots of sightings of Jake in all kinds of foodie places and restaurants We don't seem to get that anymore. Heck, it seems like we don't get much of anything that lets you in on anything personal about Jake

If that isn't the truth. Right on the mark. What pictures get out on Jake are very carefully controlled. He hasn't been seen now since forever. That guy has been in hiding for a long time. And no, that checkout counter picture doesn't count. That thing was shot from around a NYC city block, it was so far away. You can't even tell for sure that is Jake.

He's overseas alright, tho.

prairiegirl said...

This is cute, if true.

an entire cheese platter

Anonymous asked:
Was talking to my math teacher today and she told me had actually met Jake Gyllenhaal in college! It was circa 2000/2001 and she went to a party and recognized Jake from October Sky, he was sitting alone by himself (in her words) "eating an entire cheese platter" she went up to him and said hello but apparently he was very social awkward Hahaha!



As a cheeseaholic myself, I could totally identify.

prairiegirl said...

Well, my little brain is just on TILT from reading all of the tweets and Twitlonger and watching all of the videos and encore walk-by's on set today. lol. This is going to be a loooooong remaining 4 months, that's all I can say.

Now, nobody get me wrong. I have no doubt that JJ is up there in Vancouver. These 2 guys, for once, have the perfect cover. Both beards are supposed to be up there and well, it's their perfect cover to have those kids up there. I think those kids are up in Vancouver with the J's way more than people think.

One anon wondered out loud on Spn Gos why we're not seeing more pictures of Danneel. She's like the only person now besides myself questioning this very weird occurrence. Instead, we're getting Twitlongers with thesis-like write-ups of their set visit and then told,


esper ‏@wingedmisha 1h1 hour ago

please don't ask me for pics or videos of jj and danneel okay thanks
8:12 PM - 31 Aug 2016



Of course. Wouldn't think of it.

good lord. Does anyone have some ibuprofen?

prairiegirl said...

Here's a cute-as-all-get-out gif of Mr. Austy. This is just adorable as heck.

I've not seen this video before


If anyone has seen this guy, could you send up a flare please?

Methodical Muser said...


Here's a cute-as-all-get-out gif of Mr. Austy. This is just adorable as heck.


I wonder if Erika realizes that many of her top 25 guys are gay? And, I think that video of Austin is from his OTH days. Back then, he was much more approachable with fans. Let's see. How many Conventions has he been announced to attend this summer and either they have been cancelled completely or he just doesn't bother to show up. Sounds to me like the same bait and switch technique Jake has been practicing for years. Announce a bunch of commitments, get those "obligations" reported on the Internet to document your "hectic" schedule, and then hope no one pays attention to whether or not that person actually followed up. The impression that remains is that these two guys are so busy, but in different parts of the universe. When actually they are hardly working at all, nor are they far from each others side.

Methodical Muser said...


please don't ask me for pics or videos of jj and danneel okay thanks

Certainly, contrasts with the way Babygate was sold to the public, doesn't it? Cowell and company wanted everyone to know that Louis was going to be a "father", even before the pregnancy was viable. Then all we heard about for months from articles and awkward interview questions was about the pending birth. The subsequent tabloid stories, photographs and videos were even more ridiculous after the "birth". In fact, it seemed like there were hundreds of mentions and photo ops. Along the way, everyone was made to believe that it was perfectly normal for a single, millionaire boybander to not even take a paternity test after a supposed one night stand.

It just shows that there are several ways of selling an outrageous story to a fandom. It just depends what the agenda of management is. Here Jensen and Danneel are supposed to be happily married, yet we don't find out about the pregnancy until five months in and now no photos or videos of the happy couple are allowed. Probably, because she doesn't want to have a "Beyonce" moment of a collapsed silicone prosthetic. But, if anyone dares to question what is being scripted, they are marginalized as a bad fan or as a conspiracy theorist.

prairiegirl said...

Fresh off Twitter, Jake at Venice:

He's alive in Venice today

prairiegirl said...

He emerges from his Domestic Cocoon!!! There he is, the hot looking daddy-o. Doesn't he look wonderful, too. And Austin is doing his loved up part by trying to prove he's celebrating Almost-3 years of........contractual ball and chain with his goonhead beard. That sounds about right. Right on cue, Austin.

Jake looking fantastic-o! Good morning, everyone

Methodical Muser said...


Yep, Jake emerges from the abyss. He didn't seem very peppy though, did he? He waved, stayed just a minute to sign some autographs and take a few selfies. No real interaction with the fans at all and then he was off again. He hates being out of his bubble now because spontaneity is not his friend. He seeks out controlled environments where his team can dictate the questions and who gets to ask them. More signs of a deeply closeted personality.